EFAtools exposes its
functionality through a set of lowercase efa_* functions:
efa_screen(), efa_retain(),
efa_fit(), and so on. Earlier releases used uppercase names
instead (EFA(), N_FACTORS(),
OMEGA(), …). The uppercase names have not
been removed — they still work — but the efa_* functions
are now the recommended interface. This vignette explains the change,
gives the full old-to-new mapping, and walks through the migration with
the largest change to the argument list: EFA() to
efa_fit().
The efa_* names are the interface we recommend for new
code. They read consistently, share a common prefix that groups them in
tab-completion and the documentation index, and they are where the
package’s development now happens.
The uppercase names are superseded, not deprecated. In practice that means:
efa_* functions, so an uppercase name
will never grow a new argument.So there is no urgency to rewrite working code. Migrate a script when you want the new functions’ additional features (or simply for consistency); until then the old calls remain valid.
Every uppercase function has a lowercase counterpart. For most of them the migration is a pure rename: the arguments are identical and only the name changes.
| Old name | Recommended name |
|---|---|
EFA() |
efa_fit() |
N_FACTORS() |
efa_retain() |
EFA_AVERAGE() |
efa_average() |
EFA_POOLED() |
efa_mi() |
COMPARE() |
efa_compare() |
SL() |
efa_schmid_leiman() |
OMEGA() |
efa_reliability() |
FACTOR_SCORES() |
efa_scores() |
PROCRUSTES() |
efa_procrustes() |
BARTLETT() |
efa_bartlett() |
KMO() |
efa_kmo() |
PARALLEL() |
efa_parallel() |
EKC() |
efa_ekc() |
KGC() |
efa_kgc() |
HULL() |
efa_hull() |
SCREE() |
efa_scree() |
MAP() |
efa_map() |
NEST() |
efa_nest() |
SMT() |
efa_smt() |
CD() |
efa_cd() |
efa_reliability() and efa_scores() are
broader than the OMEGA() and FACTOR_SCORES()
they replace, but they cover the same use cases and are the recommended
way to obtain those quantities going forward.
efa_retain() takes estimator and
alpha_CD where N_FACTORS() takes
method and alpha. Its parallel analysis,
Kaiser-Guttman criterion, and scree plot use PCA eigenvalues, and its
Hull method uses the CAF and the 95th percentile in its parallel
analysis by default. Thus, its results can differ from those of
N_FACTORS(), which keeps its own defaults. In the same way,
efa_hull() uses ML, the CAF, and PCA eigenvalues with the
95th percentile by default, but HULL() keeps PAF, all three
indices, and SMC eigenvalues with the mean rule.
Alongside the renamed functions, the package ships tools that have
no uppercase predecessor — they are new, and available
only under the efa_* interface (and the two control
constructors):
| New function | Purpose |
|---|---|
efa_screen() |
Data screening and factorability diagnostics in one report |
efa_group() |
Multigroup EFA with factor congruence |
efa_simulate() |
Simulate data from a factor model |
efa_power() |
Power analysis for EFA |
estimate_control() |
Bundle the estimation tuning knobs (see below) |
rotate_control() |
Bundle the rotation tuning knobs (see below) |
For a plain rename, the call is unchanged apart from the name. For example, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin criterion:
cor_mat <- test_models$baseline$cormat
# Recommended name -- exactly the same arguments as KMO():
efa_kmo(cor_mat)
#>
#> ── Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin criterion (KMO) ──────────────────────────────────────────
#>
#> ✔ The overall KMO value for your data is marvellous.
#> These data are probably suitable for factor analysis.
#>
#> Overall: 0.916
#>
#> For each variable:
#> V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13
#> 0.900 0.914 0.924 0.932 0.923 0.891 0.928 0.919 0.916 0.892 0.928 0.908 0.922
#> V14 V15 V16 V17 V18
#> 0.905 0.924 0.934 0.907 0.923
# The old name still works and returns the same result:
identical(KMO(cor_mat)$KMO, efa_kmo(cor_mat)$KMO)
#> [1] TRUEEFA() to efa_fit()EFA() exposed every estimation and rotation setting as a
flat argument, which made for a long and somewhat unwieldy signature.
efa_fit() keeps the primary choices — the
data, factor count, sample size, estimator, rotation, and a few others —
as top-level arguments (see ?efa_fit for the full list),
and collects the tuning knobs into two small control
objects built by estimate_control() and
rotate_control().
Each flat EFA() tuning argument now lives in one of the
two controls:
| Control object | Arguments it holds |
|---|---|
estimate_control() |
type, init_comm, criterion,
criterion_type, max_iter,
abs_eigen, start_method |
rotate_control() |
type, normalize, precision,
order_type, varimax_type, p_type,
k, random_starts |
A few points make the translation mechanical:
type preset feeds both controls.
EFA() had a single type
("EFAtools", "psych", "SPSS", or
"none") that governed both estimation and rotation. Pass
the same type to each constructor to reproduce it. Because
the two controls are independent, you can now give them
different presets, but you do not have to.estimator instead of method —
efa_fit() has no method argument, while
EFA() keeps it. P_type is now
p_type, and randomStarts is now
random_starts; EFA() still accepts those old
spellings silently.maxit,
gam (oblimin), or delta (geomin) — are passed
through rotate_control()’s .... It validates
the names: an extra that no rotation engine can consume (for example
gamma, a misspelling of oblimin’s gam) is
rejected with an error, where EFA() silently ignores
it.efa_fit(), efa_group(), and
efa_mi() use an oblimin rotation unless you set
rotation, while EFA() and
EFA_POOLED() keep no rotation as their default.The side-by-side below reproduces an SPSS-style analysis. The old flat call and the new control-based call give identical results:
# Old flat interface
efa_old <- EFA(cor_mat, n_factors = 3, N = 500, rotation = "promax", type = "SPSS")
# New interface: the SPSS preset travels through the two control objects
efa_new <- efa_fit(cor_mat, n_factors = 3, N = 500, rotation = "promax",
estimate_control = estimate_control(type = "SPSS"),
rotate_control = rotate_control(type = "SPSS"))
# Identical numerical result
all.equal(efa_old$rot_loadings, efa_new$rot_loadings)
#> [1] TRUEAn individual knob is set on the control it belongs to. A flat
EFA(..., type = "SPSS", max_iter = 500, k = 3) becomes:
efa_fit(cor_mat, n_factors = 3, N = 500, rotation = "promax",
estimate_control = estimate_control(type = "SPSS", max_iter = 500),
rotate_control = rotate_control(type = "SPSS", k = 3))efa_fit() has no argument for a tuning knob, so a knob
passed directly is an error, not silently ignored:
efa_fit(cor_mat, n_factors = 3, N = 500, max_iter = 500)
#> Error in efa_fit(cor_mat, n_factors = 3, N = 500, max_iter = 500) :
#> unused argument (max_iter = 500)The same move — collecting flat estimation knobs into
estimate_control() — applies to the other functions that
fit a model internally: efa_retain(),
efa_schmid_leiman(), and the retention criteria that fit a
model or use EFA-based eigenvalues — efa_parallel(),
efa_kgc(), efa_scree(),
efa_hull(), efa_nest(), and
efa_smt(). efa_average() is the exception: it
keeps its flat estimation and rotation arguments, and only renames
P_type to p_type.
type Presets ReplicateThe type presets are more than shorthand for a bundle of
defaults. "SPSS" and "psych" follow how SPSS’s
FACTOR procedure and psych::fa() implement principal axis
factoring and promax rotation, and "EFAtools", the default,
combines the settings that performed best in a systematic comparison of
the three (Grieder
and Steiner, 2022). There is one place a preset alone is not enough:
because every preset keeps EFAtools’ Kaiser normalization,
"psych" also needs normalize = FALSE to
reproduce psych::fa()’s promax — and even then a small
residual difference remains, from ordinary convergence slack between the
two implementations.
Migrating a call does not break code that inspects or dispatches on
the result. The renamed functions attach the legacy class
alongside the new one, so inherits() checks and S3
methods written against the old classes keep working — including on
objects saved from earlier sessions.
The same holds for the other direct renames:
efa_retain() objects still inherit
"N_FACTORS", efa_bartlett() still inherits
"BARTLETT", and likewise for efa_kmo(),
efa_schmid_leiman(), efa_compare(),
efa_average(), and efa_mi(). The retention
criteria (efa_parallel(), efa_ekc(), and the
rest) all share the single efa_retention class they have
returned since EFAtools 0.8.0. And the uppercase functions themselves
keep working unchanged: an EFA() call returns the same
result as before, now additionally classed efa so that it
picks up the shared methods — inherits() checks against
"EFA" are unaffected.
That is the whole migration: rename the function, and — for
EFA() only — move the tuning knobs into
estimate_control() and rotate_control(). For
an overview of the full analysis workflow under the efa_*
interface, see the EFAtools vignette; the
individual help pages document each function’s arguments in full.